El Padre de toda misericordia cura las heridas del aborto

«Evangelium vitae», 99

Encíclica del Sumo Pontífice Juan Pablo II (25-III-1995)

«Una reflexión especial quisiera tener para vosotras, mujeres que habéis recurrido al aborto. La Iglesia sabe cuántos condicionamientos pueden haber influido en vuestra decisión, y no duda de que en muchos casos se ha tratado de una decisión dolorosa e incluso dramática. Probablemente la herida aún no ha cicatrizado en vuestro interior. Es verdad que lo sucedido fue y sigue siendo profundamente injusto.

Sin embargo, no os dejéis vencer por el desánimo y no abandonéis la esperanza. Antes bien, comprended lo ocurrido e interpretadlo en su verdad. Si aún no lo habéis hecho, abríos con humildad y confianza al arrepentimiento: el Padre de toda misericordia Os espera para ofreceros Su perdón y su paz en el sacramento de la Reconciliación. Os daréis cuenta de que nada está perdido y podréis pedir perdón también a vuestro hijo que ahora vive en el Señor.

Ayudadas por el consejo y la cercanía de personas amigas y competentes, podréis estar con vuestro doloroso testimonio entre los defensores más elocuentes del derecho de todos a la vida. Por medio de vuestro compromiso por la vida, coronado eventualmente con el nacimiento de nuevas criaturas y expresado con la acogida y la atención hacia quien está más necesitado de cercanía, seréis artífices de un nuevo modo de mirar la vida del hombre».

«Curar las heridas: los Rachel Groups»

Discurso del Cardenal John O’Connor, Arzobispo de Nueva York, Miembro del Pontificio Consejo para la Pastoral de los Agentes Sanitarios (15-VII-1999)

«Actualmente en los Estados Unidos, a partir de la infame norma establecida por la Corte Suprema Roe v. Wade, de 1973, cada año son eliminados aproximadamente 1’500,000 niños no nacidos. El cálculo total a partir de 1973 es de más de 30’000,000 de niños. La potencia destructora de cada aborto no permite el cálculo en términos de vidas humanas del gran número de madres, padres, hermanos, abortistas y sus asistentes implicados. Solamente muere el niño. La madre y los demás a menudo viven o tratan de vivir debatiéndose entre sentidos de culpa, tormentos, modelos normales de comportamiento transformados en su contrario. Algunos, creyéndose excluidos para siempre de la redención, entran en un círculo vicioso hecho de promiscuidad, embarazos, abortos, y abandono de la fe; si son católicos, no van a la Misa y no reciben los Sacramentos, pues se creen indignos del perdón que se les ha proporcionado en el confesionario.

Reconociendo que muchos abortos son el resultado del temor, de la pobreza, o de la incapacidad de encontrar ayuda, el 15 de octubre de 1984, en la Archidiócesis de Nueva York he anunciado que toda mujer de cualquier raza o religión, proveniente de cualquier país, encontrándose en espera de un niño podía venir a mí: le habríamos asegurado cuidados médicos gratuitos, hospitalización y asistencia legal, además que aconsejarla y ayudarla a tener al niño o permitir que sea adoptado. He repetido este ofrecimiento muchas veces. Miles de mujeres han respondido; sus niños han sido salvados, sus mismas vidas han quedado relativamente íntegras.

Pero este esfuerzo para prevenir los abortos obviamente no es retroactivo. Para los que ya han sufrido a causa de un aborto nosotros ofrecemos el Project Rachel, nombre tomado del texto del Evangelio: «Raquel llora a sus hijos, y no se quiere consolar, pues ya no existen» (Mt 2, 18). Ellos tienen una profunda necesidad de cuidados.

Desde que el Project Rachel opera en muchas diócesis de los Estados Unidos, miles y miles de mujeres, y a menudo también los que son responsables de sus embarazos y de sus abortos, han encontrado la paz - a menudo ese tipo de paz espiritual que nunca habían experimentado antes. Asimismo, ciertamente es casi seguro que ellos no volverán a caer en el futuro.

En el contexto de las Sagradas Escrituras, de la oración, del testimonio personal y de la confesión sacramental, las personas experimentan la recuperación psicológica y espiritual con Dios, con la Iglesia y consigo mismas. Este programa ha demostrado ser un testimonio real del poder curativo de Cristo y sirve también como fuente de evangelización para quienes han abandonado a la Iglesia después del aborto.

El problema de cada aborto es que incide profunda e inevitablemente en una persona, que no entra en un esquema o en una categoría. Si de alguna manera ella ha tenido una chispa de fe, de convicción religiosa y de educación moral, se siente apesadumbrada por el sentido de culpa, una culpa que puede ser empujada hacia las profundidades del inconsciente por una fuerza cualquiera, pero que se convierte en un cáncer del alma.

La madre que ha recurrido al aborto, por cualquier motivo o porque estaba desorientada o sometida a presión, tiene una gran necesidad de convencerse, más que cualquier otro en el mundo, que ha sido perdonada, no por un consultor o por sí misma, sino por Dios.

Estas madres deben creer que no obstante ello Dios las ama incluso, en un sentido profundamente misterioso, también en razón de su debilidad.

Ellas deben verse junto con María a los pies de la Cruz, uniendo la crucifixión del propio hijo con la del Hijo de María.

Ellas deben saber que habiendo compartido esta crucifixión, comparten Su perdón y que es a cada una de ellas que Él habla cuando grita al Padre: «Padre, perdónales porque no saben lo que hacen».

Deben saber que es a cada una de ellas que Él ha prometido desde la Cruz: «Hoy mismo estarás Conmigo en el Paraíso».

.

Es esta la esperanza, el objetivo luminoso, la oración ardiente del Project Rachel».

***

Pseudo-Orders of Chivalry

“L’Osservatore Romano” of 15-16 April 1935:

«For some time there has been intense activity to revive and introduce in Italy the Military Hospitaller Order of Saint Lazarus, Boigny branch, with both offers of honours of the Order for knights and dames, and with articles aimed at supporting the existence of the Order as a French branch of the ancient Order of Saint Lazarus of Jerusalem, the Italian branch of which was joined to the Order of Saint Maurice in 1572.

As the Order of Saint Lazarus of Boigny is not only not recognised in Italy but was also definitively abolished, at least since 1608, by Pope Paul V and by King Henry IV, the above mentioned activity is to be considered illegal and therefore, necessary instructions have been given that the activity be stopped and, where necessary, legal action be taken against those responsible.

We have on many occasions noted the increase of pseudo-Orders of Chivalry, both in Italy and elsewhere.

Whatever the denomination of these soi-disant Orders (St. George of Miolans or of Belgium, St. Mary of Nazareth, St. Mary of Bethlehem, St. Lazarus, and others), they are always revivals of completely extinct ancient Orders of Chivalry by private individuals who carry out intense activity acting on the good faith of those who are unable to judge these initiatives which completely lack any legality.

The phenomenon is even more serious considering that these initiatives, which are cleverly placed under historical religious institutions, are seen by most people, not as private bodies, which they in fact are, by as coming under aegis of the Church and the Holy See.

It is not generally known that ancient Orders of Chivalry were real religious Orders, coming, as other religious Orders, under Ecclesiastical Authority, Orders which consisted of professed members who emitted sacred vows as laid down by Rules and who enjoyed the ecclesiastical benefices with which they were invested.

Yet these ancient Orders have nothing in common, except for their title (when this has been preserved) with modern Equestrian decorations which, as they have undergone a complete juridical revision, exist because a Sovereign of Head of State, within the limits of their jurisdictions, has legitimised them.

The Order of St. Lazarus has none of all this. For the Holy See no such Order under such a denomination has existed canonically for centuries. The Holy See had, in fact, abolished the Order and incorporated it in the Order of St. John (the present Order of Malta) in the 15th Century, then in the 16th century, after a temporary partial resurrection, it was abolished as a body and incorporated in the Order of St. Maurice (1572), thus forming the Order of Saints Maurice and Lazarus.

Because of the then fierce political situation in France, despite the definitive rulings of the Holy See, the Priory of Boigny, with relative ecclesiastical benefices, was able to survive exclusively through royal and civil decrees.

As can be seen, it was everything but canonical and regular for a religious, albeit chivalrous, Order…! However, in order to eliminate the continual difficulties arising from the order, in 1608, King Henry IV of France, obtained from Pope Paul V recognition of the new Order of Our Lady of Mount Carmel, and attributed this new Order with the property, houses and people who, in his realms, had belonged to the Order of St. Lazarus.

Thus, in France, until the revolution, there existed an Order of Chivalry called of Our Lady of Mount Carmel and of St. Lazarus, while for the Holy See and the Roman Curia it was simply the Order of Our Lady of Mount Carmel.

Everyone will see on what shaky ground the house of the purported Order of St. Lazarus, the subject of the above mentioned communication, was built, and how the titles of knight, commander (for lay members) and monsignor (for ecclesiastical members) completely lack any foundation or reality in exactly the same way as other so-called Orders».

“L’Osservatore Romano” of 21 March 1952:

«For some time one has been able to observe the deplorable phenomenon of the appearance of alleged Orders of Knighthood based on private initiative and aimed at taking the place of legitimate knightly honours.

As we have pointed out in the past, these self-styled Orders take their names from Orders which have really existed but have been extinct for centuries or from Orders which never got past the planning stage, and from completely false Orders with no historic precedent whatsoever.

To further confuse those who are unaware of the true history of Orders of Chivalry and their juridical condition, these self-styled autonomous private initiatives, are qualified by appellations, which had cause to exist in the past, or which belonged to authentic Orders, approved at the time by the Holy See.

Thus, with almost monotonous terminology, these so-called Orders describe themselves, with varying degrees, with such titles as: Sacred, Military, Equestrian, Chivalric, Constantinian, Capitular, Sovereign, Nobiliary, Religious, Celestial, Angelical, Lascaris, Imperial, Royal, Delcassian, etc.

Included in these private initiatives, which have in no way whatsoever received approval or recognition by the Holy See are the following self-styled Orders: St. Mary or Our Lady of Bethlehem; St. John of Acre, also called simply St. John Baptist; St. Thomas; St. Lazarus; St. George of Burgundy, also called of Belgium or of Miolans; St. George of Carinthia; Constantinian of St. Stephen; Constantinian Lascaris Angelical Order of the Golden Militia; the Crown of Thorns; the Lion of the Black Cross; St. Hubert of Lorraine, or of Bar; the Concord; Our Lady of Peace... (to these and similar Orders of Chivalry with the more or less international Gold, Silver and Blue Cross Associations etc., must be added, with one of other of the above mentioned appellations, those that have taken the titles: of Mercy; of St. Bridget of Sweden; of St. Rita of Cascia; of the Legion of Honour of the Immaculate; of St. George of Antioch; of St. Michael; of St. Mark; of St. Sebastian; of St. William; of the historical but extinct Order of the Temple; of the Red Eagle; of St. Cyril of Jerusalem etc.).

In order to avoid misunderstandings which are unfortunately possible, also because of the abuse of pontifical and ecclesiastical documents, once granted for religious purposes or for merely monastic Orders, and to put an end to the continuation of such abuses, causing harm to those people in good faith, we are authorised to declare that the Holy See does not recognise the value of the diplomas and insignia conferred by the above mentioned alleged Orders».

“L’Osservatore Romano” of 14-15 December 1970, number 289 p. 2:

«Clarification. The Secretariat of State, following frequent enquiries regarding the validity of ‘honours and distinction’ granted by Bodies styling themselves ‘Chivalric Orders’ considers it opportune to renew the definitions contained in the Communication issued on the 9th April 1970.

Following a solemn investiture of new Knights of the Chivalric Order of ‘St. Bridget of Sweden’ carried out recently in a Parish Church in Rome, several inquiries have reached us for information regarding the attitude of the Holy See vis-à-vis Chivalric Orders bearing the Sacred Dedication of Names of Saints.

We are now in a position to confirm what had already been published on the subject in our paper; viz: The Holy See, besides its own Chivalric Orders, recognised by International Law, considers as Catholic Orders - and adopts as same - only the following two Chivalric Orders, viz: The Sovereign Military Order of St. John of Jerusalem, known as the Order of Malta, and the Equestrian Order of the Holy Sepulchre of Jerusalem.

All the other Orders, whether newly instituted or made to derive from the Medieval Orders, as, for example, the above mentioned ‘Order of St. Bridget’, that of ‘Our Lady of Bethlehem’ and of ‘St. John of Acre’, etc. are not recognised by the Holy See, as the Holy See is in no position to guarantee their historical and juridical legitimacy, their scope or their organisational systems».

“L’Osservatore Romano” of 4 July 2002:

«Clarification: Many letters have been received concerning the attitude of the Holy See toward the knightly orders which were dedicated to Saints or were created Sacred.

Further to this we have been authorised to confirm in this journal what has been written previously: the Holy See, besides its own knightly orders, recognises and protects only two chivalric orders: the Sovereign Military Order of Malta - also known as the Sovereign Military Hospitaller Order of Saint John of Jerusalem, of Rhodes and of Malta - and the Equestrian Order of the Holy Sepulchre of Jerusalem».

Holy See’s clarification concerning ‘The Sovereign Military Order of St. John of Jerusalem’ in “L’Osservatore Romano” of 1st December 1976:

«... Enquiries have been received from various parties asking for further information regarding The Sovereign Military Order of St. John of Jerusalem and in particular regarding how the Holy See considers this Order.

‘We are authorised to repeat the clarifications previously published in “L’Osservatore Romano”.

The Holy See, in addition to its own equestrian Orders recognises only two Orders of Knighthood: The Sovereign Military Order of St. John of Jerusalem and the Equestrian Order of the Holy Sepulchre of Jerusalem.

No other Order, whether it be newly instituted or derived from a medieval Order having the same name, enjoys such recognition, as the Holy See is not in a position to guarantee their historical and juridical legitimacy, their scope or their organisational systems.

This is also the case regarding the above mentioned Sovereign Order of St. John of Jerusalem which assumes, in an almost identical form and in such a way as to cause ambiguity, the name of the Sovereign Military Order of Malta».

***